Sunday, December 19, 2021

36 Not Out. Oops, He's Been Caught By A Googly

Morning folks - well the reindeers are coming and this years final FB was meant to be a traditional (well if you can call a handful of years traditional) Christmas Round Robin of "this is what I did this year . . blah blah blah." 
But as we all know the taste in the world isn't for "blah blah" any more, so without further ado we find ourselves cast adrift into a Dickensian world, of empty grates, fingerless gloves and "HUMBUG!".

Oh and there's NO Photography in it either.

Y'see, in this lovely, grey, arse-end of the year, I have found myself caught out. 

Back in 1985, after graduating, applying for bloody millions of jobs and being told on more than on occasion that I was "far too qualified for Scotland" (! - true answer to job application) and had to move to London for any chance of work etc etc.
"Blah blah."
I found myself faced with the prospect of penury.
However in a rather timeous manner (in those Thatcherian, "on yer bike" times) I was fortunate enough to be interviewed for a job by a bloke in a baked bean-stained Virgin Aberdeen tee-shirt and torn pixie boots; he looked a bit down-at-heel (literally) but had a demeanour, knowledge and humour that I found utterly charming. 
His name was Dougie Anderson (R. I. P.). 
He was the Scottish Regional Manager for Virgin Retail and there was something about the cut of my jib he liked, so he employed me.
Like a kid being given the keys to the sweet shop, I was excited because I was going to work in a Record Shop!

The only thing was, it wasn't what I really wanted to do.
Whether there was something in the water at Duncan Of Jordanstone, I don't know, but I graduated knowing that what I really wanted to do was 'fine art' printing. 
Not graphics (my Degree) no. 
Indeed the majority of my Degree show was landscape photography, not graphic design, much to the chagrin of my lecturers 
I'll blame Joe McKenzie for lighting a fire which still still burns bright over 40 years later.
However in line with Thatcherian Britain at the time, I was a poor ex-student with no financial backup or contacts; to become a printer would definitely have involved me getting on my bike and moving to London *** (see below).
It was a vicious circle with no way out.

So I was effectively stuck here, drowning if truth be told, until some bloke who looked a fair bit like Nigel Tufnel put out his hand and pulled me free . . . and so began 36 years of work in my other passion, MUSIC.
To-wit, Music Retail.


Virgin Dundee Circa 1987.
© DC Thompson.


That's me at the back, far left, rifling through the racks . . the one with the hair, and to the right at the far back you can see the door to my kingdom . . . the stockroom.

I think even in those hirsute days I was too hairy for public consumption, so like a troll in its lair, the stockroom it was.
But before we even got there, I shrink-wrapped pretty much the entire shop stock on a spare floor (where the concessions were) in the Glasgow Megastore. I travelled to Aberdeen for what seemed like ages, to learn stock control, filing, more wrapping, cataloguing etc.
When we moved into the Wellgate in Dundee I travelled in the back of a van from Glasgow, alongside some of my compadres, with stock, more stock, security tags and what must have been nearly a ton-and-a-bit of shrink-wrap machine. 
Try getting one of those up two flights of stairs with tight corners!
Once esconced, I estimate that I probably shrink-wrapped the best part of a million pieces of vinyl in my time there.
Having been brought up with the sanctity of handling records - y'know the drill: the open palm support, the gentle twist to the B-side, the careful cleaning with every single play - you quickly lose your awe at handling so much. 
Proprietry goes out of the window.

It was a real mill - roughly 35 boxes from suppliers A DAY.
Lugging THREE 100 size boxes of vinyl at a time (the most I could carry) up two flights of stairs - yes that's approximately 300 pieces of nice n'cheap old school vinyl with each journey up.
Then opening each box, checking the quantities on the advice note were correct, breaking it down into price points, and then writing that up on a SUP (never knew what that meant) sheet, before security tagging, price stickering and putting aside for shrink-wrapping.
When you had enough LPs sitting you got going:
Bend, pick up LP, slide it onto plattern between a sheet of 2-ply PVC wrap; pull forward with your right hand; bring down heated L-shaped 'cutter' to pinch off the PVC; use left hand to move LP onto rollers.
The rollers took the bag of plastic and sound into a heated tunnel (that didn't look too dissimilar to an airport security device) and out it came, shrink-wrap shrunk, to fall into a box, ready for collection and transport out onto the shop floor.
The PVC released really nasty fumes, and I operated like this for months until Virgin stumped up and got proper ventilation. 
This was a large electrostatic fan - the air moving through two charged grids and the floaty bits of loose plastic (from the L-shaped frame's heated cutting wires) collecting on the grids. 
It was a great system, except that said burning PVC had to pass by my head (and mouth and nostrils) before reaching the vents.
When we cleaned the vents, a thick grey sludge accumulated in the sink - it was the dickens to clean off.

All I can say is that I had a really fine lung-capacity when I started, and now I can't really puff for Puffins.

I eventually got an assistant (Hi Earl!) and between us we shifted tons and tons of 'product' in what sometimes approached 90 degrees of dry, smelly heat, in a small windowless room.
Earl eventually left to become a commando - I'll bet his basic training was on a par with working in a Virgin stockroom!

It was highly tough (OK, not like digging graves or shunting dustbins) work, but it was FUN. It stimulated the senses, both in sound, sight (all those classic 12" square covers!) and smell - all that burning acrid plastic. 
It kept you fitter than a butcher's dog, because the work was constant and heavy. It destroyed skin tone, concreted lungs, helped RSI, and was both physically and mentally exhausting,  but at the end of the day it got the ackers into the money-making machine that was Virgin Records, so that was all that mattered eh!
Sir Richard should think about his ex-employees when he is gadding about in space - if I am anything to go by, a lot of his ex-stockroom folk are either dead or pretty buggered health-wise.

But back to the FUN - in those halcyon days, you could buy a brand new chart LP for £4.99. 
Nowadays it's £19.99+. 
Back catalogue, the real grist to the mill, started at £3.49 for premium titles like Led Zeppelin, and so on and then worked down from there. 
The average 12" single was a strangely expensive £1.99.
7"'ers were around a pound. 
Cassettes were similarly priced to LPs. 
The new-fangled Compact Disc ran to around £10+ - they were expensive

Seeing as I have made my life's living off of selling them, I'll maybe write about them more.
They were initially the ground of the:
 
"Hey baby, wanna come back and listen to my new CD player" 

working man!

That's true, oh you tucked-in jumper, white-socked smoothies with your beefy pay-packets!
God bless you.
We stocked on opening approximately 350 CDs - that was just about it for UK production, but as their popularity quickly disseminated out into general use, manufacturers got on board pretty fast, and a tidal wave of both UK, European and the delightfully environmentally unfriendly American anti-pilfering long box came onboard. 
It still astounds me that in 1987, people were paying £20+ for Japanese imports of Pink Floyd albums on CD, because EMI over here hadn't really cottoned on yet.

Weird how the world changes when music becomes devalued by online retail and then streaming becomes the norm and people ditch CDs like they're anathema.
For all that the humble silver disc is slagged off as being hopeless these days, you know, these wonderful little 5"ers are still valid. 
Aside from the fact they've put a roof over my head and expanded my knowledge of the wonderful world of recorded music and catalogue, they're so fecking easy to deal with.

I find the 'vinyl revolution' very interesting - one drunken stumble with your favourite premium £35 copy of 'Are You Experienced' and you're stuffed. 
I know because I did it in 1974 with my copy of 'Mott' - I wasn't drunk, but it slipped, bounced off the edge of my Dansette and forever (even today) - I still hear that click during 'The Ballad of Mott the Hoople (26th March 1972, Zürich)'.

But back to Virgin - gosh I miss that shop (and I never thought I'd hear myself saying that). 
I was lucky enough to work with a fantasticly talented team of people - all of them PUMPED about the music they loved, all knowledgable (y'know, like the geeky assistant in Hi-Fidelity) in ways that probably wouldn't seem normal these days. 
We covered the breadth of music, from Be-bop and Swing (Hi Stuart!) through Punk (Hi Graham!) R&B and Funk (Hi Libby!) Disco (Hi Audrey!) Ghastly Chart Pop (Hi Jan!) ALL back catalogue (Hi Jim!) weird pre-Americana (Hi Brian!) standard stuff (Hi Jill!) through others and back to me and my love for rock, metal, and guitar instrumental music.
We worked bloody hard for Richard Branson and for a smaller Virgin shop (albeit on two floors) we sold a TON of stuff. 
We would rack out say every Iron Maiden 12" single available to that point (approximately 7 or 8 titles - most of them imports at around £6) 25 deep on a Friday and they'd be gone on a Monday. 
Dundee is a music town. 
At the time is was delineated by its tribes, and they mostly all bought music (some nicked it of course but that is another story).
When they excavate Tayside in 20,000 years time I am sure they'll find a layer of Talking Heads 12" singles, with sub-layers of The Mission and The Cult; pockets of Led Zeppelin and Neil Young and Van Morrison; a Smiths magma, Dirty Dancing Soundtrack shale and don't forget the Farley Jackmaster Funk sub-layer . . .

Then in 1988 disaster happened and the Virgin group, in their bid for world domination, sold off 67 smaller shops to Our Price to fund said operation.
Everything changed overnight
Goths sacked for making the place "look too dingy"; colleagues told on a Wednesday that they were starting in a different branch on the other side of the country on the following Monday; myself, banned from serving the public because my hair was long; managers placed under so much pressure that the Voddie bottle in the filing cabinet was de rigueur.
It was a Pogrom
Our Price only wanted their own people in charge and as such made it as difficult as possible for ex-Virgin staff who asked too many questions.
On the whole, to us seasoned vets, Our Price People seemed to know little about music save what they'd seen on Top Of The Pops, and they were consistently placed in charge of people who breathed, slept and ate at the broad table of The Gods that was Modern Music.
The Regional Manager for Scotland and his henchman were like the Batman and Robin of rules. 
They had precious little musical knowledge between them, but knew what to say (sound familiar?) and knew how to enforce the new house rules. 
Having engaged their ire (like the Eye Of Sauron) by standing up for a part-time Saturday girl (who was brilliant at her job but got sacked all the same) the pressure came to bear, and I found myself (after a period of great pressure and angst) in the position of having to resign.
Bastards.
It was difficult.
They call it Constructive Dismissal - being forced into a corner where your only option is to resign.

And then like a hand reaching down into the mire of despond, Rock City came along (Hi Graham!).
You've never heard of them, but they were a secondhand and new shop based in St. Andrews in Scotland in the late 80's/early 90's. 
And they gave me a job. 
I think the proto-KT Tunstall bought some records there.
It was a great little business - furiously busy at times, and then tumble-weed at 11am on a Winter's Tuesday morning. 
I really enjoyed my brief time there; discovered great new/old records; learned the ins and outs of the used vinyl trade; bought stuff; sold stuff; had big laughs with customers; cleared the shop with the then virtually unheard of  Nirvana's 'Negative Creep' and just generally had a good time that kept the wolf from the door.

Then one day I got a phone call:

"Are you Herman Sheephouse?"
"Yes."
"The same Sheephouse that worked for Virgin?"
"'Yes."
"Would you like a job?"

Well it paid more (and more importantly had access to all those luscious guitar import CDs that weren't available in the UK) and so I found myself in the longest stretch of my career.
Hello CDS!

For 31 years I have dealt with customers that are wonderful, weird, annoying, funny. knowledgable, kind, appreciative and generous. All of us linked by that one thing - music.
It has been the bread of my working life.
I have handled and processed boxes of stock from literally around the world.
I have dealt with and sold music to people from the UK through Europe to Turkey and into Asia, Japan, and Australia and New Zealand, and on into Polynesia, making the jump across the Pacific into the whole of the Americas from Alaska and Canada right the way down to Patagonia.
Every phone call has been a discovery, pretty much, from funny regulars through to people who were/are quite frankly cracked. 
We've had loonies, freaks, 'normal' people, passionate music fans, celebrities, musicians, all sorts.
I've fielded questions and sourced the impossibly rare.
It's been a blast actually.

Back at the start in CDS, pre-internet days, it was a brain and a bunch of catalogues that got you there; that and the ability to follow leads and jump, Sherlock-like, on a trail long-gone cold, in search of that elusive catalogue number. 
Wonderfully logical, cats (that's a 'trade' term) were Willie Wonka's Golden Ticket, so long as you could match them up to the correct distributor.
Once all the tumblers clicked into place, you then had to assume the item was actually still in stock - not always the case when dealing with catalogues that were out of date as soon as they were printed. 
This was the days before live computerised stock control too.
But like I said, you got your magnifying glass out and followed the bloodhound!
Navigating the seas of Asian catalogues, replete with Asian characters, transposed Ls and Rs (Yes, Beatres, Lolling Stones etc); through to Russian broadsheets printed on the thinnest paper ever; underground dance culture catalogues that arrived incognito through the post; home-made affairs cobbled up from a typewriter, photocopier and proper old school punk cut and paste; glossy corporate affairs through to the firm favourite single-sheet faxed over.
I saw it all, and reacted appropriately.
Ordered.
Imported.
Paid the MCPS sticker.
Sold the disc.

I was going to write a bit here about how massive online retailers, well one in particular, selling at cost or below cost have pretty much destroyed an industry I loved, but I won't because what I was going to write was so full of piss and vinegar and sheer bile, it frightened me, and was probably all too easily misinterpreted as the rantings of someone who is just about to lose their job (4 days and counting down folks!)
I will say one thing though to you, the buyer and your need to save a couple of quid with the easy lazy click - you're playing into some strange hands and you're dreaming yourselves into the most bizarre Dystopian future that nobody could have imagined.
I'm not criticising though, just pointing a few things out, because they're coming for you too.

So in the future, when you're in a lovely new care home, that was made possible because you released the equity in your house to a super-massive corporation, and you're currently having your drool wiped by a Care-bot, branded by the same, whilst shitting into a nappy branded by the same, you'll be able to watch a lovely drama, starring a holo-actor that used to be someone to do with Star Trek and laugh and point and remember a time when freedom and choice went hand in hand.

Y'see, unfortunately in the process of this worldwide application of megalomania, my beloved Music Industry has been hit and left at the side of the road like a squashed forgotten hedgehog.
In the UK, the small. local record shop? Pretty much gone. 
America - the Mom and Pops; the local emporium of joy and discovery? All gone.
Europe is a wasteland apart from a few small beacons of light - Hi Judith! Hi Ron!
Everywhere you look in the world something massive has taken place, and all because you the customer want the convenience of sitting on your bum and purchasing with the easy click, and more to the point, want to save money - no matter how little in real terms.

Like Isis firing missiles and lobbing grenades at Ancient Babylonian monuments, so a vital, collective culture, has been utterly destroyed.

Record shops were a right of passage. 
They held meaning. 
They were where you went and met people who weren't at all like you and you loved them, or people who were like you and you hated them.
They informed, annoyed, delighted, transported, captured, enthralled. 
In short, they gave meaning to people's lives. 
They brought joy.

And it's nearly all gone, courtesy of that easy click. 
And gee, you get that CD delivered, in a day or less. 
You don't go and rake. 
You don't go and ask to listen, or grab an opinion from another customer. 
You don't head home, wondering whether you've bought the right thing. 
You don't get that transition whereby you can't really tell if you like it or not, but you've bought it so you might as well give it a go. 
And that wonderful, slow, transition from strange taste to nectar, whereby your new purchase becomes the most important thing in your whole life
No, you send it back - done - not my taste man.
No wonder we're in a cultural maelstrom of shit and brilliance, that's more blended with shit than it is with brilliance.
Cultural discovery and curiosity have been poleaxed.

"Like this? You'll love this!"

As the Algorythms (yeah that is misspelled - so what!) judge your 'thing' and chance is largely by-passed, you are only fed stuff you like
Your whole DNA of taste is laid bare and open to what something thinks you'll like.
How fucking boring.
I've done this for long enough to know that I don't even know what I do and don't like.
That's the beauty of being a human.

You could take the super-highway to your destination and get there in double quick time, or you could go via the backways and maybe, just maybe, you'd find somewhere you liked even more.
I know which I prefer.

And that's what world-dominating online retail has done. 
I lay the blame firmly at someone well-known's feet.
Well I would except he is in space.
Saving mankind.
With an old guy.

And that as they say is that.
My work is now in the process of 'winding down'.
The future is cancelled and certainly more uncertain than I have ever known it.

To coin a phrase that weirdly and coincidentally I found pencilled on the wall of our house when redecorating a couple of years back (it is literally 3 yards away from me as I type this, buried for the future under wallpaper):


A Dickensian Requiem


"2 paid off, December (??) 1883."

God only knows what losing your job in 1883 must have been like.
My thoughts are entirely with the spirits in this, because to me it has felt like a death in the family.
And I'll draw a line under it there.

On the positive side, and to quote a meme that is entirely my own:

"Time is the most precious thing you don't own."

I'll see how things pan out - I have time to dedicate to photography and all the million things I've always meant to do, but have never had the time for.
I bless the day I met my wife - without her, things would be considerably darker.
I feel positive in the weirdest way.

So until the Solstice turns and the nights start drawing out again, this has been an unusual one and as always thank you for reading.
As you've no doubt realised there's no photography. 
Normal service will resume in the New Year - Winter is here - what better time to break out the 5x4!

To you and yours and to your attitude to the world in general, be kind to people.
Mankind needs to act now for the greater good of mankind.
I wish that the era of egotism and greed were coming to an end, but sadly I can't see that. 
As long as you keep buying and believing in these really very socially awkward people and their dominion over data and technology, then they'll continue to stamp their weirdness on our future.
Culture will start to feed on itself, instead of growing.
The future is branded and wants every last penny.

It's not the world my parent's fought for in WWII.

Nor is it the golden Space Age that my contemporaries and I foresaw back in the 60's and 70's.

It's something considerably darker; more akin to the Film Version of Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep.
And I really don't like that.

So on an end note, be good, take care and even if one of you starts thinking about how the world we're going to hand to our grandchildren is going to pan out, we can make it turn now.
For good.
We have to.

Be good and take care.
Merry Christmas

Herman XXX



*** Good buddy and long time FB commentator Bruce Robbins has told me that I was exactly the sort of guy that could have ended up in the photography department at DC Thompsons. Who knew!

Friday, December 03, 2021

Tales From The Fogbank (Part 2) - Trust The Bubble

Morning folks - well at least the clock says it is, however, outside in the big black, Black, it says otherwise - jings it is dark, and truly gloomy, like the greyest afternoons of childhood mixed with the most depressing day of your life - ghastly.


© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
City Of Dreams


Sometimes in your photographic life you'll encounter a situation whereby you have little recourse but to continue - you've loaded film, you don't want the kink forming, and you're just desperate to do 'Something'!
Such was the case with me recently.
As long-time readers will know I have spent most of the year not taking photos as I was involved in DIY during the lovely warm months when light fell from the sky like gold-spun nectar and photographic opportunities presented themselves gently and in spades like a never-ending afternoon tea  of cakes, nibbles, endless quaffing of the golden draught and good company.
None of that for me though - it was a brutal graft of scraping, burning arsenic and lead, forearms developing like a soldier crabs' and sweat.

And so I find myself now at the arse-end of the year, raring to go, and nothing but gloom - but when has that ever stopped me? 
So there I was, a few weeks back with an urge greater than a mating salmon and a great idea to try out the Hasselblad panoramic adapter I have - it's approximately a bit less than 6x3cm - and see what I could come up with.
I got t'missus to drop me on the way to work and walked from Broughty Ferry (a sort-of satellite suburb - Gawd how they'd hate me for saying that - of Dundee) to the city centre. It's a great walk taking in segregated dockland and all sorts. Sadly it used to be considerably better as you could poke around the docks, but post 9/11 all that changed.
Having rather a large amount of Bergger Panchro to use I thought I'd give that a go too - why not? I was enthused.

The day was gorgeous - cold and sunny and I snapped with impunity. I was delighted to be out.
I raced home, and processed my still-steaming film.
And discovered that no matter what you might read - Bergger Panchro does not like Pyrocat, though curiously they make their own staining developer for the film. 
You may recall I used the combo here
I thought I had to give it another chance. 
I'd shot another roll and developed that with ancient HC110 and that had come out OK - it's a EI 100 film, not 400 though. 
Putting the initial film down to my mistakes, I tried again. 
And what did I end up with?








© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
Denser Than A Dense Thing
Tales From The Fogbank (Part 2)



Can you feel my pain? Look at the density of the paper black! The images are battling the overall fog-level.
There are frames I am truly proud of on there - even with the obvious upside down strip on the right . . you try getting Bergger to lie flat  . . . 
Despite that, the film had a completely even stain of fog meaning that I had done nothing during exposure, it had all come from the interaction of film and developer.
I've developed numerous varieties of film in Pyrocat and I've always liked its consistency in timings - there is always the possibility I had over-developed, but I'd had less fog than this on the original super-foggy one - I had no idea what was going on.
When I use PHD I take it to a point with gentle agitation and then let it sit for a number of minutes - this has worked with Ilford and Kodak and Foma films - I get consistent printable results - could Bergger be that different? 
The times btw were the same as the super-foggy roll yet that wasn't nearly as dense as this one - super weird.
Anyway, whatever, I was fizzing (again).
The contact above was a two and a half minute exposure at f5.6!!!!!!! and it still wasn't enough.
I even tried printing something and this is what came out.



© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
Dinner At The Docks


It has been tootled to the nines with software and is definitely not my idea of a 'fine print' - the print itself is ghastly, printed on Grade 4. 
It is as they say a ferking shame.
So where does that leave me with Bergger?
Well to you and yours it is probably a decent film, but to me I shan't use it again. To be honest it really reminded me of Retrophotographic's own-brand Panchromatic from the early 2000's. I didn't like that either.
So, horns drawing in, it is Ilford only for me from now on in. I trust it. Consistent results and quality control

OK - so that's the angst out of the way - time for a nice Aero, all them bubbles, because, indeed, from this hour of calamity, something good did come.

Y'see, as well as compounding my need for failure with using Bergger, I had also employed a 91 Deep Red Filter. Why? 
Well I am rather enamoured with architectural photography at the moment, and having read a bit about it, decided that using a red on standard film would give me some interesting contrast on buildings. Not only that, but viewing the world through a red filter, is VERY addictive. Everything takes on such a strange hue - whites are brilliant, shadows are dense - everything looks completely exciting!!

In Tales From The Fogbank (Part 2) I'd been using the 500C/M and 60mm Distagon . . and . . the newly acquired (well way back in March) combo of Gitzo CF monopod and ballhead.
In praise of monopods: [I've owned a monopod before - another Gitzo - but it was only ever good for poking teenagers and fighting off bears - in short it was bulky, quite heavy and unwieldly. It also had a non-non-rotational leg and was a bit of a faff.
By comparion, the GM2542 is superb and another experience altogether. Compacted it is a very short and easily transportable swagger stick. I added a Novoflex Ball 30 and thread-locked an old Hasselblad QR to it. The set-up is as stable as a rock.]

Cue some nice muzak, whilst yer Sheephouse wanders off and has a couple of Vodka and Tonics.

Hmmm, is that Lord Stock and the Fauntleroy Five, playing "Rhapsody in Grey"
Sounds like it.
I'll have a couple of frozen peas in my Voddie, just for a change . . . .


© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
A Place Of Shelter


So I regrouped and thought feck it, I am going out again, but this time with the Happy-Time Snapshot Special .  . the Hasselblad SWC/M.
If Lee Friedlander can use it as a snapshot camera, then why not me.

The weather was a blanket of deep grey, and rain, lots and lots of rain - you can see it in what looks like bromide drag in some of them - nope - cylling down, straight down . . . 

It had been fine when I'd been dropped off but quickly turned into a "Oh shite!" moment as it started coming on in torrents. 
After one desultory frame, I packed away as the skies opened - I wasn't going to get the camera out again in all that, and headed for the nearest shelter - in this case Dundee's delightful City Quay:

"Located around the former Victoria Quay on Dundee's waterfront, City Quay is a retail, leisure and hotel development, which together represents a re-vitalisation of the area costing more than £20 million. Located on the north side of the dock and opened in 2002, the retail complex occupies listed former warehouses and extends out into the dock itself. The 155-bedroom City Quay Hotel lies to the west, next to the Dundee Customs House and Harbour Chambers and the former main entrance to the harbour. Housing development has taken place to the east, next to Camperdown Dock.
The development includes a marina, together with the Frigate Unicorn, launched in 1824, and the former North Carr Lightship, both permanently berthed in Victoria Dock.
City Quay is owned by the Port of Dundee Ltd., a subsidiary of Fort Ports Ltd., who own and operate the harbour."
Copyright - Gazeteer Of Scotland

Bruce from the OD has some wonderful photos of the area before it was titivated - I kind of wish it was still like that, but you can't stop 'progress'.

Anyway, the covered open walkways provided ample cover to take the rather poor photos I took.



© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
Dinner At The Docks - Redux


This is a scanned enlargement of the image area of the print.
Normally they look like this:



© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
Tiny Little Print


That's a scan of yer actual print - tiny eh! 
I've been printing almost exclusively on 5x7" paper in recent times, simply from the point of view of economy - you can actually print twelve or so decent prints in a fairly short session once you get going, plus it has a nice tactile edge to it.
I quite like the Waffer-Thin (cue Python) border - that's courtesy of the handed-down Leitz easel. It's dead easy just to shove your paper in and get going.
The paper is bog standard Ilford MGRC and I'll print that at Grade 3 as a matter of course. The developer was First Call's standard developer which is long-lasting and quick-acting (cooo, compound adjective city) and a variant on an old Agfa formula - in other words nuthin' fancy.

The remarkable thing to me about these photographs is that they were monopod supported at exposures  of (mostly) 1 second at f5.6 - they're really sharp. 
I was (crazily) using a B&W Deep Red (91) filter which necessitated a -3 EV adjustment on my meter.
Here's shome more - makes you want to visit doesn't it!


© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
Anyone For Golf?


© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
City Of Dreams - Different Angle


© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
Shopper's Paradise


© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
That's A Decomissioned Rig Y'know


© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
Watch Out For The Seething Crowds


© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
Look Wot They Dun To My Bridge (Sorry Noddy)


© Phil Rogers Dundee, Phil Collins, Phil Sick, Phil Worse, Philanthorpic, Phil Better, Phil LIke The Good Times Are Back. Philatelic,
Skater's Paradise


Some weird artefacts have been added from the scanning - I am afraid my scanner is pretty hopeless, and I've not lessened the pain in the ghastly dreariness of the day - it was as dull and grey as that - last Winter we had around three months of it - everyone turned into frogs.
As the old expression goes:

"Nice weather for ducks!"

You know I've rambled on for ages and have forgotten to say why you should "Trust The Bubble" - well here goes.

When photographing any form of architecture, you have to trust the bubble on your tripod or camera - in my case it was the Hasselblad Bubble. Unless you have enough elevation; a view camera; or are a long way away and can adjust things, then you have to assume that whoever built the stuff you're photographing worked to a builder's level. 
I know that sounds really obvious, but it is true. 
If your bubble is bang on, then (theoretically) everything else in the photo should follow that verticality.
This might not apply in Amsterdam!
However on the whole, trusting the bubble is the way to go.
Of course you'll get converging verticals, but to an extent these can be eye-balled out by some judicious framing, but on the whole - trust the bubble. If you're dead on with that even converging verticals can look fine.

Reading the above post, I realise I could have just cut to the chase and said:

"look, just trust it" 

at the start and spared you all the pain!

And that as they say is that. 
More architectural stuff in the new year - it's the Nouveau Thang.

Until then, take care, watch out for that dog muck on the pavement on these dark evenings and keep shuffling along towards the precipice.
Be good and if you can't be good, be careful.
H.

P.S. To Ye Anciente Dundonians

I know it sounds and looks like I am slagging off this City - y'know, I'm not. I've lived here a long time now and have come to appreciate the little things that make (and have indeed made) this City a great place to live and work. It could have been so much more though (thank you "The Most Corrupt Council In Britain In The 1960's") - here's what Oor Bri has to say - click here:

However it is pointless dwelling on the past, we've a future to make, it just needs the right people handling it. Some joined-up thinking would be good!













Tuesday, November 09, 2021

Split

(Started in August 2021, and please beware, because it is probably controversial, daft, thick, thought-provoking [?], polemic, opinionated, wrong, true, interesting and dull all at once. It is also a long read, so be prepared with provisions and a rescue team just in case)

Morning folks - hope you are all a rootin' and a tootin'!
This post is an interesting one, because as I start typing I have no idea where I am going, and no idea what (if any) conclusion or usefulness will come out of it; however as is often the case, I find the keyboard to be as valuable as a psychiatrist's couch, so please bear with me whilst I set the slurry lorry on flick and get spattering all that lovely watery cowy goodness out the back whilst pootering along this particular field.

Putt, Putt Putt . . .
Splat, Splat, Splat . . .


© Phil Rogers Dundee,Leica M2,35mm f3.5 Summaron
Battling Glare, Darkness, Spotlights, 
Full Aperture And A Handheld One Second Exposure, 
The M2/Summaron  Combo Delivers The Goods . . . 
Weirdly.
Proudly Unchimped.


Me and t'missus settled down to watch something we'd recorded off BBC 4 a while back:
Rankine's Photography Challenge. 
I was excited; it isn't often photography is featured on TV, so this was somewhat of an event. 
I munched my Lidl's Digestive and sipped my cup of really rather strong coffee and was genuinely waiting to be wowed. 
Cooo!
Here were the candidates, all fresh faced and toting really not inconsiderably expensive cameras. 
There was a young lad describing how he'd sleep in carparks in order to catch a sunrise; an older bloke with PTSD who said that wildlife photography had saved his life.
I noticed there were others; a healthy mix of all genders, very woke and PC, but to be honest by this stage I'd mentally switched off. 
Why?
Well amongst the pontificating of:

"That's The ONE!" 

"I'd be proud of that!!"

"Get down on the ground and shoot it from there!!!"
 
"Coo, you don't get many of those to the pound!"

(Made that last one up actually) something in me had begun to feel really rather sick. 

There were about a billion shutter activations in the first fifteen minutes. 
Studio flashes like miniature atomic space battles
People 'chimping' left right and centre.
Kids putting themselves in shutterly inappropriate positions - the way people mishandle handguns in films (you know, loose wrist, pointed sideways) - camera as an extension of forearm.
It was snappy, overloaded and packed to the gunwhales with jaunty camera angles and semi-shouty presentation to make it look interesting, and sadly, like two Cokes plus a kilo of candy-floss plus several spins on The Sickener, this fairground ride made me feel the way I always feel at fairs:

Queasy with a capital Q.

So I turned to the missus and said:

'Can we watch something else?'

And that was a shame, it really was, because these people were buzzing with photography
They were truly enthused.
To coin a certain Mancunian phrase from decades ago, they were:

Mad For It.

I wished them well, bade them good luck and with a heavy heart and a sick bucket, switched to something else.

The "something else" was a program which is still in my head.
It was a BBC documentary about Lee Miller
What an extraordinary life, however it was her contact prints from the liberation of Dachau and Buchenwald which left a mark. Though not shown closely, what she said in the frames taken with her Rolleiflex said oceans more than a million digital spray jobs. 
And then, the fact that said experience made her pack away all her negatives and prints and not talk about it for years, speaks volumes about how much of herself she put into taking those photographs.
And also how much those photographs took out of her.
You can find out more about her here.

The following night, just because, we watched a documentary about Ansel
To say the guy was driven, would be a slight. 
These days you'd probably say he had OCD.
It came as no surprise that the huge channeling of human spirit, energy and sheer effort that went into the taking of every negative and the making of every print, came about as a result of methodical obsession
I believe this could only ever have been achieved with film and paper. 
He would never have been able to internally and externally transition the piece from "score to orchestra"' (negative to print) with some photoshop moves and an inkjet printer. 
Absolutely no way José.
To watch him dodging and burning was like watching the poetry of great dance or, dare I say it, football. 
It was transfixing, assured and magical all at once. 
A master class in craft skills and second nature.
It was definitely not the nurdling around of a mouse and cursor and ordering some 1's and 0's to: 
"Do THAT!"
It was not some old geezer checking his screen after every shot.

I thought about it and was so stunned by the apparent dissolve between these masters and what passes for photography in this digital age that I had to investigate further.

It will come as no surprise that You Tube is a tremendous source of old photographic documentaries.
Name the crafts-person (gotta be PC y'know) from a bygone age and you'll probably find something about them on there in some form.
From the classic Parkie-style interview, to decent overviews. 
And it is weird because you'll see the overlaps too - great photographers who have gone over to the Light (room) side like it means little to them.
Yet I truly feel something has been lost, and in that loss lies a blackhole that is at the centre of current photography:

The photographer as printmaker.

Bill Brandt (BBC Master Photographers) was a revelation to me. 
I only really knew Bill from a handful of photographs, but in this programme there were countless great images - so stylistic and austere, yet better than anything I have seen produced in 'modern' times.
To paraphrase a conversation in the programme:

Interviewer: "Mr. Brandt, you always do your own printing don't you?"
BB: "Oh yes."
Interviewer: "It is very important to do one's own printing?"
BB: "Yes, definitely, very important, yes . . . because I change pictures completely in the darkroom . . . most of the work is done in the darkroom . . . "


© Bill Brandt Estate


André Kertész? The poet who wasn't technical enough for the American Photography Scene (apparently).
Whilst enamoured with polaroids (technically geeky I suppose) at the end of his life, he produced numerous beautiful images which were all the more perfect for their imperfections. 
I couldn't imagine him chimping at his Canon's screen - he knew exactly what the photograph he had taken would look like. How's that for confidence and skill? 
The post-digital world of perfect, everything in focus from 3" to infinity and then HDR'd to the hilt, would I think have left him cold.
Look at this.


© André Kertész Estate



It truly is exquisite in colour, composition and form. 
A simple sculpture and mirror in his apartment and a piece of Polaroid film.
OK, the smelly wet stage of printmaking was taken away (although remember the 'orrible caustic stuff you use to get with Polaroids . . hmmm) but it is still a print and besides, he'd earned his stripes for decades.
The colours on the Polaroid are ageing in a way like the patina on a piece of Bronze Age metalwork - it is beautiful.

Delving deeper and randomly, I came across a documentary about the British photojournalist Tim Page.
A young man, leaves home at 17; travelling he picks up a camera and gets somehow caught up in Vietnam! 
It is an old BBC Arena called "Tim Page - Mentioned In Despatches"
Unlike other war photographers I have seen, who have dealt with the aftermath in more stoic ways, Tim (in the documentary) seemed to be that same young man fresh from combat, frozen in time, back in civi-street, recovering from debilitating war injuries, trying hard to find something to hold onto to keep him from drowning in the downright ordinariness of 'normal' life. 
He finds some solace in photographing an RAF camp filled with Vietnamese Boat People - there he truly looks at home. 
In his local Charrington pub, quaffing a pint of Charrington's Best Bitter (or so it looked) and smoking a fag, he looked pensive, evaluative; to be frank, out of sorts as they say.
In the documentary he replies to a question (in a Q&A session) about carrying a gun, and explains, that he never really did because guns are heavy, especially when you are carrying 4 cameras, 6 lenses and 50 rolls of film.
50 rolls - 12 or 1800 images as if your life depended on it. 
Finite. 
They had better count.


© Tim Page
© Tim Page


And man did they count. 
Look at the above - one image that sums up the human cost of war. No corpses, but the young man's demenour says more than anything I have ever seen.
If it were digital, there'd be screeds of images, the scene would have been sprayed, broadcast live to a news feed, looked at once and probably forgotten.
And yet here, Tim's skill and eye have rendered the cost, visible on one perfect frame of film; one perfect print.
That's photography. 
He took pictures like he was never sure whether he'd be coming back; fearless. 
Negatives, slides.
I found his images incredibly hard to look at, and yet, to paraphrase him:

". . . there is a lot of Asian softness in them."

You should watch it.
His website is here.

I could go on about the documentaries, but I won't - you owe it to yourself to find them.
It isn't hard.
The above is the merest skirting of the subject though - get looking and thinking.

Dipping on further and looking at my small collection of books, I came to the conclusion that it is the finite quality of traditional photography which defines it

You take a picture, process it, print it, file it. 
It is a one-off artefact - even manipulated via multiple negatives (a la, say, Julius Shulman's astonishingly beautiful architectural photographs) and all the work done in a darkroom to bring it to completion.
If you have never encoutered Shulman and you love black and white (and buildings) you owe it to yourself to seek them out - they're really fantastic.


© Julius Shulman Estate


This was apparently a composite of three negatives, nevertheless it is wonderful. 
The skill involved at all stages to get to the final print is breathtakingly complex.
The printer's skill has not been outsourced to a computer.

The print becomes the full stop on the image. 

The image defines the moment.

Yet I don't think it's really like that anymore.
You might well disagree with me, but to my mind it really isn't.

Have a break - have a Kit Kat.


Aaah, that's better!

I understand there are many concerned and committed photographers out there taking important pictures and I have nothing but respect for them, but the digital rendering is to my mind just convenience. 
It is the 'norm'. 
Everybody else is doing it so why don't we?
You possibly even have little choice with editors and picture people on your back wanting something yesterday.
You can whizz that important image around the world in nano-seconds. 
There is no waiting whilst you send your films back to an ever-awake processing department.
There is no wait whilst you close the door on your darkroom and sweat.
The screen has become the pseudo-print, but rather than that print being put aside in a pile, or brandished in a breathless run to show someone, your image is now a collection of part-remembered photons in your mind's eye. 
Scrolled by contemporaries . . .
In the words of Alex Harvey:

"N. E. X. T. . . Neeeeexxxt!"

And it isn't just to do with how your precious image is stored and presented either; film and digital, obviously they are both utterly different, but to tie things in with my original ride on The Sickener from the top of this 'ere page, it's the sheer ease with which everything can be done.

There used to be an expression 'kicking against the pricks' - whilst the usual interpretation is about authority, I have always thought of it as something that ties in with art. 
Art is struggle.
Photography used to be a struggle.

To my mind though, in ALL creative pursuits, struggle can be beneficial

You strive to do better.

I remember once walking for miles, taking many (so I believed) fine photographs, only for said photographs to be rendered null and void by expired developer. 
It is a thing you only do once. 
It informed me. 
It made me a more careful craftsman.

With digital, you no longer have that. 
You check every single bloody image
Make sure it is perfect on the spot. Just watch the news!
You delete those that you don't like and yet, to quote Tim Page:

"Every day is an assignment. Every picture you shoot, even be it an idle snap; I'm using the word snap, in a sorta very loose context.       
The snap is gonna be valuable."

Snaps are gone with digital - eradicated by the monkey-move and the editorial thumb.

You could argue that the plethora of idle phone pointing that goes on, is the snap.
Well yes, I can see how you come to that, except they're not really, simply because they only exist on a screen. 
They will never  be gripped and looked at again; beery, smoky, greasy fingers will no longer leave their mark. Spitty crumbs of laughter will not mar their perfection.
(As an aside I'll draw your attention to The Anonymous Project - a laudable collection of old slides - their like will never be seen again.)
In my family, we still sometimes drag out prints and snaps from decades ago and laugh and talk and reminisce - it is a wonderful, unexpected and oft overlooked aspect of being a (semi-modern) human.
Who would have thought, when photography was first being developed and people had prints made for relatives, as keep-sakes, records of their lives, that those simple (yet vastly complex) pieces of time would come to define their lives?
Identity was established; some kind of social grace was incurred - all dolled up in your Sunday Best, and thence on to the snap, the wonderful delineation of humankind in all its incredible variety.





Look at at the above - a chance physical find whilst doing some tidying. 
That's me in a photo-booth 40 years ago! 
A close relative to Kertész' polaroids, technology wise. 
It exists in the world. 
It isn't a collection of data lost on some hard-drive, or more likely, deleted as no longer relevant.


Can you see where I am going?
Far from furthering an art-form I love; far from moving it forward, I feel that creatively and archaeologically, digital has pretty much killed 'photography' (as I know it) stone dead.
Cuddle up with that phone and scroll through all those pictures - oh can I see that one with the rubber chicken? 
Oh shit, where the heck is it? 
Och God I can't be arsed . . . . 

But then maybe that is just me. 
A rank amateur living on the East coast of a very small country - what do I know? 
I'll bet most people disagree with me. 
But I look around (a lot); I trust my eyes and my observation of quality and bog-standard snappery from ages past, and I see little now that surprises or impresses or pleases me.
What a feckin' B.O.F. eh!

And then there was a pause during which yer author rubbed his chin and thunked.

Re-reading the above a month or two later, I decided I was being too polemical, too pontificating and too downright opionionated, so I decided to put some distance between me and 'it' and see how I felt a while later.

So, a month or so later:

I feel that what I wrote makes me sound like an arse.
What right have I to pass judgement on one of the world's most popular hobbies?
How can I stand here and say that truth is no longer what it used to be? 
You could argue that photographically truth was never what it was.
I can totally see where you are coming from. 
And yet, I can't quite put the way I am feeling about the current state of photography into words. 
Maybe it has always been thus. 
Millions of images, with maybe one in hundreds of thousands that makes you go:

'OH!'

There currently seems to be no end to the massed ranks of clamour; of images made for pleasure, purpose, or mostly, so it seems, just because you can
The digital image knows no boundaries, and I don't mean in the creative sense, I mean it in the sense that it is an ever-expanding frontier of data assembled into pictures. 
There is no physical limit simply because you don't really need to think like that anymore. 
You are not going into a combat situation with 50 rolls of film. 
You are not limited by the physical length of a roll.
The sky is the limit, and even then  . . .

Even the most careful digi-photographers I know complain endlessly about the sheer amount of stuff they have. 
It is archived and filed and amassed on hard drives or clouds, and it sits there by the myriad, consuming energy in a pointless waste of storage, because nothing will ever happen to photo #15 of the 300 you took of your children playing ball. 
You really won't make that nice picture of a daisy (in macro-mode) into a nice picture for your partner. 
IT IS FACT - YOU SIMPLY WON'T.

They say that traditional photography was environmentally unfriendly in its use of chemicals and resources, but I conject that digital photography is far more unfriendly simply in its power usage. 
Not only that but the traditional photograph impacts environment relatively quickly: a release of noxious chemicals, the results filed away and delved into occasionally; but that is it, the results are yours. Of course you have to factor in the silver mining and plastic production, but counter that with rare earth metals in every camera battery, the plastics in every SD card. 
And you've got to think about the trillions of digital images stored on servers; all drawing energy for their storage whether viewed or not, usually not. 
Some are printed, but they're still stored on physically ultimately fragile devices like hard drives or flash media or SD cards - future landfill.
Of course on the other hand they could also (unwisely) only be stored on cloud storage, where they are entirely at the behest (unpaid, or peppercorn-rent guests as it were) of digital flop-houses. 
An uncertain future! For should owners of said digital flop-houses maybe start charging considerably more, because of power costs, because of hunger for more dosh, for whatever reason, what then happens to a visual history of the latter half of the twentieth, early part of the twenty-first century? 

Yep: 

"Oh that old picture, nah, not going to pay for that." 

"I've got another 30 of the kids, forget about that one." 

Look how truly fragile this digital world really is.

I know we could sit and argue this till the cows come home - maybe you should come around sometime and we could head to the pub.
All of the above reads like it was written by someone who at a certain time of life has become thoroughly entrenched in their thinking and has no wish to look over the parapet. 
Strangely, I wouldn't blame you for thinking so, but also, I wouldn't count myself as one of those.
I am open to argument, but I also know what I like and what I think, and if you are from 'the other side' as it were, my salutations to you - I am not taking a pop, just providing a different slant on what you'll see elsewhere. Hopefully it will make you think about the physical/un-physical fragility of the modern world.

To be honest, my bias towards so-called 'traditional' photography is as firmly entrenched as an old wellie in a huge pool of cow shit. 

You might be able to extract me, but it would be incredibly messy for both of us

Best let entrenched boots lie, eh?





To round things off, the above is a perfect example of why, like Tim Page says, the snap matters.
This was a 'snap' with a Hasselblad SWC/M.
The light was sort of like that - heavy cloud cover and a brief bit of liquid sunshine hitting the path making the stones really stand out. 
I did print the sides down slightly (in a poor fashion) but on the whole it was pretty much like that.
It has sat as a scrap in my darkroom for a year or so. I never ditched it, just used it for setting print borders.
Now I come to look at it properly, I like it.
Had it been digital I would probably have deleted it at the time.
Not saying, just saying . . . .

As I finish, I'd like to say that really, I know none of you, however if you are a printmaker, I tip my tifter to you - you're keeping something vital alive, and if you don't run a darkroom but get other people to make prints from your negatives, I tip my hat to you too, because you're producing something physical.

If you're a squirter (sorry - that's my own nomenclature) well at least you are printing, but as far as I am concerned, it really isn't the same. The skill set is vastly different. 
This being said it doesn't NOT make you a photographer, it's just a shame that the world of modern photography has been skewed away from something that was always its beating heart - THE DARKROOM.

If all you ever view is screens, think again - it is worth the effort to try and change that. Buy a modern Polaroid camera and go and have fun - it will transform the way you feel about making images, and the Polaroids will probably outlast you as well - something for future times. A present from the past.

That's it - thank you for reading once again.
Take care, be safe and watch out for the normal people.