Friday, September 15, 2023

Auld (R)Age

Morning folks - hope everyone is well.
The Winter is starting to draw in with a great rapidity that I never like, though this year I am determined to embrace it more and not be so bothered that it is getting dark at 3.30PM!

Anyway, without further ado, I have recently been using a couple of truly old . . well, older than me . . . photographic devices - it's been fun and is the pure antithesis of today's 'do everything' cameras. 
No, they're not LF cameras either, nor is it the Mamiya Press (which is kind of like using a LF camera, but with a handle - you go through similar processes and checklists before every exposure . . and after too!) No these were different from the point of view of snapability.

Take a bow please, a Canon L2/35mm f3.5 Nikkor and a Rollei Old Standard. The former from 1958/1951 and the latter from 1934/35.


© Phil Rogers Dundee,Canon L2,Nippon Kogaku Tokyo,35mm f3.5 Nikkor LTM, Rolleiflex Old Standard,Ilford Pan F,Fomadon R09 1+50,1:50 Rodinal,Ilford MGRC

They've been fun to use and like anything older, required a wee bit of tweaking from me to get results I was happy with.

In the Canon/Nikkor case, that was fitting a lens hood (I ended up using my 5cm FISON - you would think it would vignette, but it doesn't, and it clamps like a champ!) and not being too radical with my choice of shutter speeds. Whether it is because of all the gripping and scraping I have been doing as DIY or an age thing, or possibly even the weight of the camera - it is very light - I found that it is quite sensible, where possible, to decide on 1/30th as my slowest shutter speed.
It does rather limit your choices, but what can you do . . if you want to explore fun in an ancient style, then maximise your potential.

The Old Standard was a bit different, in that you can sort of use your body and a wall as a tripod whilst gently pulling down on the neck strap - it is a surprisingly stable way of doing things, even with a camera as light as the Rollei. 
And it is a light Rollei - certainly lighter than my T. 
It makes the likes of a Mamiya C330 look and feel like a house brick from a black hole!
The Tessar is also of a different quality to the Tessar on my T. 
Bruce would call this UB (Unsubstantiated Bollocks) but to my eyes it is true. 
The T's Tessar is a single coated lens; the early Tessar on the Standard is uncoated and therein lies its magic - in much the same way that early Leitz Elmars have that glowy look to them (more UB?) the same can be said of the Old Standard. 
I can only imagine what it would be like with its proper hood.

Anyway, here's some photies . . . oh and I forgot to say that using such ancient machinery may well result in the likes of the following comment (which I loved):

"That's an affie auld camera!"


© Phil Rogers Dundee,Canon L2,Nippon Kogaku Tokyo,35mm f3.5 Nikkor LTM, Rolleiflex Old Standard,Ilford Pan F,Fomadon R09 1+50,1:50 Rodinal,Ilford MGRC

Probably my favourite carpark picture - everything fell into place and, despite the sun falling on the plexiglass window, the dark splendours of the concrete cathedral have been revealed. The 35mm f3.5 Nikkor is a fine lens - I feel very priviledged to be able to use it.

This is printed on Ilford MGRC at Grade 4. Film was HP5 at EI 200 developed in HC110 (Dilution B) for a total of 8 minutes (I stood it from 6) - a nice combo and the inherent mild contrastiness of HC helped to contribute to the lack of contrast in the scene.

Sadly the 'waterfall' has since gone.


© Phil Rogers Dundee,Canon L2,Nippon Kogaku Tokyo,35mm f3.5 Nikkor LTM, Rolleiflex Old Standard,Ilford Pan F,Fomadon R09 1+50,1:50 Rodinal,Ilford MGRC



© Phil Rogers Dundee,Canon L2,Nippon Kogaku Tokyo,35mm f3.5 Nikkor LTM, Rolleiflex Old Standard,Ilford Pan F,Fomadon R09 1+50,1:50 Rodinal,Ilford MGRC


These are the Old Standard - I like them both.

The first was printed at Grade 4.5 on some very old MGRC - I can go no higher using the DeVere's colour wheels! The photograph, is pretty much exactly how I saw it, and the Tessar has rendered the scene beautifully softly.

The second was printed at Grade 4'5 too. 
One wonders how it is possible to go, in a print, from really soft (the building with the Paper (white) Sun behind it to incredibly hard (the woman's feet and the bright pavement). 
There was no split grading involved and I can only assume the camera has contributed. 
There's an enormous amount of detail in there too - not too shabby for a nearly 90 year old lens.

Film was the combo of out of date (2009!) Pan F and Fomadon R09 at 1+50. 
VERY GENTLE agitation to 10 minutes and then let it stand to 12.
I'm not normally a 'street' person, but I like this a great deal - it looks old despite the modern bus shelter.

The older I get the more I realise that Rodinal can be used almost universally for most subjects - a wonderful developer and if I only had to have one, then it would probably be it.

And that's it - short and sweet.
The two old 'uns are currently having a natter about the state of the world over a cup of Darjeeling and a couple of hobnobs.

Until the next time, over and oot and keep taking the pills.
H xx