Sunday, February 23, 2025

To Blakemore

Morning folks - a curious title again, so let me explain.

I was sorry to hear of the death of John Blakemore recently and it struck me as truly sad that he was never really recognised as one of the greats
But he was. 
That is as true as a day can be long.
With regard to the photographic representation of the British landscape people will talk about McCullin or Kenna or Godwin or even Ravilious till the cows come home, but John Blakemore? 
No, not so much. 
To me he was quintessentially the personification of British Landscape Photography - a ground-breaker and also grounding-force and I believe that anyone who calls themself a landscape photographer these days owes him a debt, whether they've heard of him or not.

As a young Sheephouse, he was the first photographer I really wanted to emulate.
This was especially the case when I got my hands on a Mamiya TLR, because I felt, truly (and at last, with Medium Format providing a size of negative I found awe-inspiring and satisfying) I could achieve something with photography more akin to what my eyes (and soul) made of the landscape and also what John told me could be done with film and paper.


© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



Regular readers will know that I enmired myself in a certain place after the death of my father and it became a sanctuary of solace. 
There was nothing 'Chocolate Box', or 'The Grand View' there; it was somewhere far more mysterious and atmospheric; very much concerned with the passage of time and my deep sadness; the cycle of life and also the bounteous bounds of Mother Nature herself. 
John's photography made me feel that I could channel my feelings for that place into something tangible . . . and a whole lot more.
As a Graphic Design student, part of my degree show was set aside to photographs of the mystery of the land - it meant that much to me.

Whilst in latter years I never attempted to copy his style, there was a massive something of a hangover from those early years that engaged my perception and made me the photographer I am today, and I thank him for it. 
Lucky to have had two great photographers involved so deeply in one's life - Joseph McKenzie as tutor and mentor and Blakemore as inspiration.

“To be alone in the landscape was a release, a return to the pleasures and pursuits of my childhood which had been lost to me.” John Blakemore

"The Photography Department at Duncan of Jordanstone College Of Art, was the ruby in the pig's arsehole." Joseph McKenzie

Anyway, I recently returned to a place that I hadn't visited for nigh on 15 years.
I'd always longed to get back, but time, circumstances and finances had worked against me, so it was with great delight, that I said YES when my friend Neil from the Forum offered to take me there.

I was suitably equipped (bar one piece of essential equipment - more of that in a minute) with a Gitzo CF tripod and Kirk BH1, the 500C/M with a prism (not a WLF) and the 40mm Distagon. 
The missing equipment was a damn good walking pole to help me get down some impossibly steep and slippery banking, but maybe next time! 
Film was fresh Kodak Tri-X - I've been stockpiling, so it was nice to be able to use something current as it were.

The day though was ghastly, with a wan wind containing a right chill - add that to the water and sheer wet energy (and spray) forcing its way down the gorge and it made for very cold walking. 
The atmosphere though was absolutely wonderful, as was the company. 
Neil bought his digital Leica (the fat one - sorry - can't remember the number) and his 28mm Elmarit - his favourite combination - I suppose when you know how encumbered I was, there's a great deal of advantage to such a set-up. 
Light and unbulky being the main one. 
Also easy to put away if you're dealing with rough as feck ground and semi-dangerous footing.

I suppose the advantage of my set-up was that the tripod made for a good prop going downhill. 
The prism also made it so much easier to view the scene - for a start everything was the right way around and secondly, when working at low angles I was clearly able to see where the tripod legs were intruding into the scene - this has been a bit of a problem in the past as the Distagon is a f4 lens and combine that with Scottish weather and early mornings . . . well.

Anyway, this is all rather moving away from Blakemore and me - I think you can see his influence quite clearly in the following pictures - it wasn't a conscious decision, just stuff that caught my eye. 

"To make a final print is to establish the world of the image, linked to but different from the segment of reality depicted." John Blakemore

They're all printed on Fomabrom Variant fibre with the matt (112) surface - it is DEAD flat and I think somehow lends itself to the images. It also dries very well for a FB. 
I've not tried it in glossy, but in matt (and toned in selenium) it can look remarkably similar to the legendary Forte Polywarmtone, a paper I loved very much.
If you're a printer I have to say, buy some, you get tremendous satisfaction using it, just be aware of the extreme flatness of the image - the paper has not even a whiff of sheen.
Yes I could probably have produced the same thing on Hahnemuhle art paper for a tenth of the cost, but I didn't. 
They were processed in Bellini developer and double-fixed in some Bellini fix with a wee tweak in Selenium just to add some more ooomph to the lower D-Max of matt paper . . oh and on that front, you wouldn't think it, but they were all printed at Grade 4.
I have also had to tickle the black point and contrast in scanning, because the paper is incredibly hard to scan well - the way they look on screen is fairly close (but not quite) to how they look as physical prints.


© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



© Phil Rogers,John Blakemore,Joseph McKenzie,Analog Photography,Analogue Photography,Foma,Kodak Tri-X,Fomadon R09 1+75,Black And White Printing,Monochrome Printing



What you are seeing in the sequence is how I exposed the roll of film, bar the first frame which I didn't have time to print! Not bad going though, considering. 
Oh and if you know where this is, please keep it under your hat - next thing we know it'll be groaning with Insta photo-shoots.

And that, as they say, is that. it's hard to say from blog to blog what is going to come out - sometimes I wheel out the same old guff and other times I surprise myself. 

What I do think though is that writing this blog gives me empetus to keep on creating and that in itself is a positive thing.
That and the inspiration from Mr. Blakemore - weird how something can live with you for decades until you put your finger on it. I have clearly been inspired!

So on that note, take care, be good and remember that rubber trousers are terrible for your skin.
H xx







8 comments:

  1. Nice pics, Phil. You’ve done well. It’s lovely up there but I’ve never found it an easy place to photograph. Think I’ve got one good one from my trips.

    I wouldn’t worry about the cost of the Foma. Hahnemuhle photo Rag is about 90p per A5 sheet which is dearer than the Foma! You’d have to be like me and go down market for the cheaper stuff.

    As for the location, I wouldn’t worry about that either. It’s on Tripadvisor, the ramblers’ website, Walk Scotland, Scotland off the Beaten Track, Visit Angus - it’s everywhere! When I first went there it was a “discovery” (for me) - I’d never read anything about it. Mind you, that was my first time around with the Mamiya Press so about 35 years ago.

    Now everyone who goes there is following in the footsteps of others. It’ll be like the Angus Bryce Canyon before long. But it’s been like that for years. Did you not say you’d read about when you went there 17 years ago? It hasn’t been a secret for an awful long time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very true I suppose - I'm just waiting on 6 buses full of Chinese tourists - it hasn't quite achieved the fashion shoot status yet, but it wouldn't surprise me to encounter a full wardrobe and lights team there sometime!
      I much prefer the footage from the webcam when that storm came through a year or so back.
      Thank you for the comment - I find it quite an easy place to do as it were - no idea why!

      Delete
  2. I think we see photographs and do photography in completely different ways.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How's the dry-down with this paper Phil? Compared to Ilford's matt version for example? Printing on dead matt paper to a high standard is much more demanding than glossy, but when done well it can be very beautiful.
    I now remember Forte's various surface finishes from about 20 years ago. There were so many, and they were all so beautiful I could hardly make up my mind which one use. I had bought a packet of each surface and made a print of the same picture on each of them. I can't recall their codename though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Omar - there's little darkening - to my eye it looked pretty much the same when first hung as when dry, but I'm never scientific about such stuff. The surface is completely flat, as in absolutely not even the slightest bit of sheen. It does look a wee bit weird in that the images look to be more machine printed with matt ink on a matt surface if you can imagine that. I like it though - it would probably suit portraiture very well - the base has a slight warmth to it. I've never used Ilford FB matt - always more of a glossy man. When you get your darkroom up and running again give some 5x7 a shot. I had to tone it in selenium just for some extra oompah, plus as I said printed it at Grade 4.
      Nice to hear from you again.

      Delete

  4. There are some good photos there. My favourite is the fourth from the bottom. The one with the rocks and stream all pointing to a line of trees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Marcus - hope you are keeping well.
      That was a pretty precarious photo . . down a steep bank and poised on some slippy rocks above the flow of the stream . . my feet got a bit wet!

      Delete

Hello!
Feel Free To Chat,
But Remember,
"Anonymous" Comments WILL NOT Be Published